Development of a Scale to Evaluate Patients' Compliance with Nursing Instructions and Professional Behaviors Towards Nurses: Applicability and Psychometric Assessment Study
Fatma Ezgi YORGANCILAR
,BİLSEV İNCE
Fatma Ezgi YORGANCILAR: NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ
Objective: Patient behavior in clinical settings plays a critical role in shaping care processes, communication quality, and treatment outcomes. While existing research has largely focused on adherence and patient satisfaction, there remains a lack of comprehensive instruments that capture the multidimensional nature of patient behavior within clinical interactions. This study aimed to develop and initially validate the Clinical Patient Behavior Scale (CPBS), a multidimensional instrument designed to assess patient behaviors in clinical settings based on healthcare professionals’ evaluations. Materials and Methods: This methodological study was conducted with 300 nurses working in a university hospital. An initial item pool of 30 items was generated through a comprehensive literature review and expert evaluation. Content validity was established using expert ratings. Construct validity was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Results: The CPBS demonstrated excellent sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.939) and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.001). EFA revealed a five-factor structure explaining 73.37 % of the total variance. CFA indicated excellent model fit (CFI = 0.992, TLI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.016). All factor loadings were statistically significant. The overall internal consistency of the 30-item scale was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92). Conclusion: The CPBS provides initial evidence of a theoretically grounded and psychometrically robust instrument for assessing patient behavior as a multidimensional construct in clinical settings. The findings represent initial validation evidence, and further studies are recommended to examine cross-cultural validity, temporal stability, and external validity across diverse healthcare contexts. of BK virus in autoimmune disease pathogenesis.
Cite this Article As :
Yorgancilar FE, Ince B. Development and Initial Validation of the Clinical Patient Behavior Scale: A Multidimensional Assessment Approach. Selcuk Med
J 2026;42(2): 181-189
1. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
2. Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA, et al. A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;73(5):691–705.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04167.x.
3. DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: A quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care. 2004;42(3):200–209. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9.
4. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, et al. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub3.
5. Zolnierek KBH, DiMatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: A meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–834. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc.
6. O’Hagan S, Manias E, Elder C, et al. What counts as effective communication in nursing? Evidence from nurse educators’ and clinicians’ feedback on nurse interactions with simulated patients. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(1):9–22. doi: 10.1111/jan.12296.
7. McCabe C. Nurse–patient communication: An exploration of patients’ experiences. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):41–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00817.x.
8. Halldorsdottir S. The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: Introduction of a synthesized theory. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008;22(4):643–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00568.x.
9. Papastavrou E, Efstathiou G, Charalambous A. Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of caring behaviours: Quantitative systematic review of comparative studies. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(6):1191-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05580.x.
10. Suikkala A, Leino-Kilpi H. Nursing student–patient relationship: A review of the literature from 1984 to 1998. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(1):42-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01636.x.
11. Peternelj-Taylor C. An exploration of othering in forensic psychiatric and correctional nursing. Can J Nurs Res. 2004;36(4):130-46.
12. Berglund M, Westin L, Svanström R, et al. Suffering caused by care—Patients’ experiences from hospital settings. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2012;7:1-9. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v7i0.18688.
13. Johnson M, Cowin LS, Wilson I, et al. Professional identity and nursing: Contemporary theoretical developments and future research challenges. Int Nurs Rev. 2012;25(4):312–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.01013.x.
14. Kitson A, Marshall A, Bassett K, et al. What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(1):4-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x.
15. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2017.
16. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, et al. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.
17. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
18. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2016.
19. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage; 2019.
21. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
22. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al. Designing Clinical Research. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.