Geriatrik Hastalarda Hafif Bilişsel Bozuklukla İlişkili Olabilecek Periferik Biyobelirteçler

Okan İMRE , Ömer ACAT , Mustafa KARAAĞAÇ , Fatih EKİCİ , Rahim Kocabaş

  • Okan İMRE: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi
  • Ömer ACAT: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
  • Mustafa KARAAĞAÇ: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
  • Fatih EKİCİ: SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİRESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ
  • Rahim Kocabaş: karaman üniversitesi
  • Year : 2025
  • Vol : 41
  • Issue : 1
  •  Page : 42-48
Amaç: Hafif bilişsel bozukluk (HBB), bilişsel fonksiyonlarda azalmanın olduğu, erken müdahale edilmediği takdirde işlevsellikte kayıpların yaşandığı bir bozukluktur. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız HBB ile kontrol grubu arasında, nötrofil/yüksek- yoğunluklu lipoprotein kolesterol (HDLc) düzeyi oranı (NHO), monosit/HDLc oranı (MHO), ürik asit/HDLc oranı (UHO)’nı kıyaslamak ve bu parametrelerin HBB için prediktör bir biyobelirteç olarak kullanılıp kullanılamayacağını araştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kesitsel olan bu çalışmada 65 yaş üstü kişilerden ICD-10’a göre HBB tanısı konulan 68 kişi hasta grubunu oluşturdu. Kontrol grubu 65 yaş üzeri mental yeterlilik değerlendirmesi sonucu HBB olmayan bireylerden seçildi.
Bulgular: Monosit, UHO ve MHO seviyelerinin HBB grubunda daha yüksek olduğu görüldü (sırasıyla; p= 0.036, p= 0.007, p= 0.004). Mini-Mental Durum Muayene (MMSE) skoru ile HDLc seviyeleri arasında pozitif (p= 0.032), UHO arasında negatif yönlü ilişki (p= 0.019) bulundu. Tanı durumunu tahmin etmede UHO cut-off değeri= 0.1285 alındığında duyarlılığın %41.9 ve özgüllüğün %80.3 olduğu bulundu. MHO için cut-off değeri= 0.125 alındığında duyarlılığın %40.3 ve özgüllüğün %78.9 olduğu görüldü.
Sonuç: Düşük duyarlılık ve özgüllükte olsa da HBB tanısını tahmin etmede UHO ve MHO anlamlı bulundu. MMSE skoru ile HDLc seviyeleri arasındaki pozitif yönlü ilişki bulunması HDLc’nin bilişsel fonksiyonlara karşı koruyucu olabileceğini göstermektedir. UHO arttıkça MMSE skorunun düşmesi, UHO’nun prognozda kullanılabileceğine işaret edebilir. Çalışma sonuçlarımızın ileriye dönük çalışmalarla desteklenmesi gerekir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Geriatri, mini-mental durum, bilişsel işlev, monosit/HDLc oranı, ürik asit/HDLc oranı
Cite this Article As : Imre O, Acat O, Karaagac M, Ekici F, Kocabas R. Peripheral Biomarkers That May Be Associated with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Geriatric Patients. Selcuk Med J 2025;41(1): 42-48

Download Citation: Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) RIS File

Download Citation: BibTeX BibTeX File

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Selcuk Medical Journal
2025, Vol. 41 (1)
ISSN: 1017-6616
E-ISSN: 2149-8059
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. 1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. J Archives of neurology. 1999;56(3):303-308.
  2. 2. WHO. Dementia 2023 [1 September 2021]. Available from: : https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia.
  3. 3. M Ashraf G, Chibber S, K Zaidi S, et al. Recent updates on the association between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. J Medicinal Chemistry. 2016;12(3):226-237.
  4. 4. Glynn K, O'Callaghan M, Hannigan O, et al. Clinical utility of mild cognitive impairment subtypes and number of impaired cognitive domains at predicting progression to dementia: A 20‐year retrospective study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021;36(1):31-37.
  5. 5. Garcia-Esparcia P, Diaz-Lucena D, Ainciburu M, et al. Glutamate transporter GLT1 expression in Alzheimer disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2018;10:122.
  6. 6. Power MC, Willens V, Prather C, et al. Risks and Benefits of Clinical Diagnosis Around the Time of Dementia Onset. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine 2023;9:23337214231213185.
  7. 7. Mitchell AJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): an update on its diagnostic validity for cognitive disorders. Cognitive Screening Instruments 2013:15-46.
  8. 8. Garg N, Choudhry MS, Bodade RM. A review on Alzheimer’s disease classification from normal controls and mild cognitive impairment using structural MR images. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2023;384:109745.
  9. 9. Popiołek AK, Chyrek-Tomaszewska A, Stachowicz-Karpińska A, et al. Biochemical parameters in cognitive functions. Neuropsychiatric Disease Treatment. 2020:2479-2489.
  10. 10. Selkoe DJ. Preventing Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2012;337(6101):1488-1492.
  11. 11. Zhang R, Miller RG, Madison C, et al. Systemic immune system alterations in early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2013;256(1-2):38-42.
  12. 12. Corlier F, Hafzalla G, Faskowitz J, et al. Systemic inflammation as a predictor of brain aging: contributions of physical activity, metabolic risk, and genetic risk. Neuroimage. 2018;172:118-129.
  13. 13. Shen X-N, Niu L-D, Wang Y-J, et al. Inflammatory markers in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 170 studies. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery Psychiatry. 2019;90(5):590-598.
  14. 14. Sucato V, Comparato F, Ortello A, et al. Novo G. Residual Cardiovascular Risk: Role of Remnants Cholesterol, Monocyte/HDL Ratio and Lipoprotein Ratios on Personalized Cardiovascular Prevention. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024;14(5):460.
  15. 15. Jiang M, Sun J, Zou H, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;9:807339.
  16. 16. Wei Y, Wang T, Li G, et al. Investigation of systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein ratio, lymphocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio as indicators of inflammation in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2022;13:941728.
  17. 17. Wang H, Ba Y, Gao X, et al. Association between serum uric acid to high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio and arterial stiffness in a Japanese population. Medicine. 2023;102(31):e34182.
  18. 18. Bazmandegan G, hasan Dehghani M, Karimifard M, et al. Uric acid to HDL ratio: A marker for predicting incidence of metabolic syndrome in patients with type II diabetes. Nutrition, Metabolism Cardiovascular Diseases. 2024;34(4):1014-1020.
  19. 19. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research. 1975;12(3):189-198.
  20. 20. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, et al.. Standardize mini mental test’in Türk toplumunda hafif demans tan› s› nda geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2002;13(4):273-281.
  21. 21. Choe YM, Lee BC, Choi I-G, et al. MMSE subscale scores as useful predictors of AD conversion in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychiatric disease treatment. 2020:1767-1775.
  22. 22. Sümbüloğlu K. Regresyon yöntemleri ve korelasyon analizi: Hatiboğlu Yayınları; 2007.
  23. 23. Kanık E, Erden S. Tanı testlerinin değerlendirilmesinde ROC (receive operating characteristics) eğrisinin kullanımı. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;3:260-264.
  24. 24. Liu Q, Peng M, Yang T, et al. Uric acid levels and risk of cognitive impairment: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Plos one. 2023;18(11):e0293832.
  25. 25. Xue L, Liu Y, Xue H, et al. Low uric acid is a risk factor in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychiatric Disease Treatment. 2017:2363-2367.
  26. 26. Khaled Y, Abdelhamid AA, Al-Mazroey H, et al. Higher serum uric acid is associated with poorer cognitive performance in healthy middle-aged people: a cross-sectional study. Internal Emergency Medicine. 2023;18(6):1701-1709.
  27. 27. Kim TS, Pae CU, Yoon SJ, et al. Decreased plasma antioxidants in patients with Alzheimer's disease. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2006;21(4):344-348.
  28. 28. Mijailovic NR, Vesic K, Borovcanin MM. The influence of serum uric acid on the brain and cognitive dysfunction. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2022;13:828476.
  29. 29. Cimiotti CGV, Paganetti P, Rossi S, et al. Correlation between Blood Monocytes and CSF Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease: The Effect of Gender and Cognitive Decline. NeuroSci. 2023;4(4):319-330.
  30. 30. Guedes JR, Lao T, Cardoso AL, et al. Roles of microglial and monocyte chemokines and their receptors in regulating Alzheimer's disease-associated amyloid-β and tau pathologies. Frontiers in neurology. 2018;9:381108.
  31. 31. Saresella M, Marventano I, Calabrese E, et al. A complex proinflammatory role for peripheral monocytes in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2014;38(2):403-413.
  32. 32. Wu C-Y, Bawa KK, Ouk M, et al. Neutrophil activation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of protein markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Ageing Research Reviews. 2020;62:101130.
  33. 33. Huang L-T, Zhang C-P, Wang Y-B, et al. Association of peripheral blood cell profile with Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022;14:888946.
  34. 34. Cho K. Neutrophil-Mediated Progression of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(19):14795.
  35. 35. Svensson T, Sawada N, Mimura M, et al. The association between midlife serum high-density lipoprotein and mild cognitive impairment and dementia after 19 years of follow-up. Translational psychiatry. 2019;9(1):26.
  36. 36. Vasantharekha R, Priyanka HP, Swarnalingam T, et al. Interrelationship between Mini‐Mental State Examination scores and biochemical parameters in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Geriatrics gerontology international. 2017;17(10):1737-1745.
  37. 37. Zimetti F, Adorni MP, Marsillach J, et al. Connection between the Altered HDL Antioxidant and Anti‐Inflammatory Properties and the Risk to Develop Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review. Oxidative medicine cellular longevity. 2021;2021(1):6695796.
  38. 38. Kou T, Luo H, Yin L. Relationship between neutrophils to HDL-C ratio and severity of coronary stenosis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorder. 2021;21:1-8.
  39. 39. Huang J-B, Chen Y-S, Ji H-Y, et al. Neutrophil to high-density lipoprotein ratio has a superior prognostic value in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a comparison study. Lipids in Health Disease. 2020;19:1-12.
  40. 40. Chen G, Yang N, Ren J, et al. Neutrophil counts to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio: a potential predictor of prognosis in acute ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis. Neurotoxicity Research. 2020;38:1001-1009.
  41. 41. İmre O, Caglayan C, Muştu M. The Relationship of Cognitive Dysfunction with Inflammatory Markers and Carotid Intima Media Thickness in Schizophrenia. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023;13(9):1342.
  42. 42. Yaffe K, Bahorik AL, Hoang TD, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and accelerated cognitive decline in midlife: The CARDIA Study. Neurology. 2020;95(7):e839-e846.
  43. 43. Bolayir A, Gokce SF, Cigdem B, , et al. Monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio predicts the mortality in ischemic stroke patients. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska. 2018;52(2):150-155.
  44. 44. Tudurachi B-S, Anghel L, Tudurachi A, et al. Assessment of inflammatory hematological ratios (NLR, PLR, MLR, LMR and Monocyte/HDL–Cholesterol Ratio) in acute myocardial infarction and particularities in young patients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(18):14378.
  45. 45. Murphy AJ, Woollard KJ, Hoang A, et al. High-density lipoprotein reduces the human monocyte inflammatory response. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, vascular biology. 2008;28(11):2071-2077.
  46. 46. Kurtkulagi O, Tel BMA, Kahveci G, et al. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is associated with elevated serum uric acid to high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio. Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine. 2021;59(4):403-408.
  47. 47. Zhang Y-N, Wang Q-Q, Chen Y-S, et al. Association between serum uric acid to HDL‐cholesterol ratio and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean Chinese adults. International journal of endocrinology. 2020;2020(1):5953461.