Management of intussusception in children: When to observe, when to non-surgically reduce, and when to operate?

CANAN KOCAOĞLU , Hasan Madenci

  • CANAN KOCAOĞLU: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
  • Hasan Madenci: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
  • Year : 2026
  • Vol : 42
  • Issue : 2
  •  Page : 108-112
Objective: To evaluate demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes of children diagnosed with intussusception via ultrasound (US) and develop
an algorithm for managing these children.
Materials and Methods: Sixty-five patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2023 were evaluated. Length of invaginated segment, clinical findings, treatment approach,
time from onset of symptom to admission, and results were examined.
Results: Median age was 34 months (range 2-156) (27 females, 38 males). Patients were grouped as follows: Group 1: Medical follow-up and treatment (n=24), median
presentation time: 30.5 hours (8-48), median invaginated segment length: 32.5 mm (12-65). Group 2: Hydrostatic or contrast reduction under US/fluoroscopy (n=21),
median presentation time: 24 hours (8-48), median invaginated segment length: 50 mm (20-120). Group 3: Emergency surgery (n=20), median presentation time: 36
hours (12-100), median invaginated segment length: 46 mm (20-100). Segment lengths of Group 1 and Groups 2 and 3 differed significantly (p=0.001, p=0.002). There
was a significant difference in presentation time between Groups 2 and 3 (p=0.035), but not between Group 1 and the rest. Hydrostatic reduction failed in six patients
in Group 2, requiring surgery. In Group 3, most patients undergoing surgery were reduced manually, but four required resection.
Conclusion: Intussusception can be transient in some cases. Intermittent US is an appropriate approach, especially for intussusceptions shorter than 32.5 mm. For
longer segments, if the patient's general condition is good, hydrostatic reduction should be the preferred approach. However, in cases having serious clinical findings
such as late presentation, palpation of abdominal masses, or presence of “currant jelly” stool, surgical intervention should be performed without delay.
Keywords: Children, hydrostatic reduction, intussusception, ultrasound
Cite this Article As : Kocaoglu C, Madenci H. The Management of Intussusception in Children: When to Observe, to Non-Surgically Reduce, and to Operate? Selcuk Med J 2026;42(2): 108-112

Download Citation: Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) RIS File

Download Citation: BibTeX BibTeX File

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article is published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Selcuk Medical Journal
2026, Vol. 42 (2)
ISSN: 1017-6616
E-ISSN: 2149-8059
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. 1. Columbani PM, Scholz S. Chapter 85—intussusception. In: Arnold G. Coran editors. Pediatric surgery, 7th Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2012. p.1093 1110.
  2. 2. Güney LH, Fakıoğlu E, Acer T, et al. Is every intussusception treatment an emergency intervention or surgery? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016;22(2):139-44. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.06013.
  3. 3. Charles T, Penninga L, Reurings JC, et al. Intussusception in Children: A Clinical Review. Acta Chir Belg. 2015;115(5):327-33. doi:10.1080/00015458.2015.11681124.
  4. 4. Okumus M, Emektar A. Pediatric intussusception and early discharge after pneumatic reduction. Acta Chir Belg. 2019;119(3):162-165. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1487190.
  5. 5. Ülger FE, Ülger A, Karakaya AE, et al. An easy, safe and affective method for the treatment of intussusception: ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20(2):127-31. Turkish. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.37898.
  6. 6. Xie X, Wu Y, Wang Q, et al. A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(8):1464-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005.
  7. 7. Binkovitz LA, Kolbe AB, Orth RC, et al. Pediatric ileocolic intussusception: new observations and unexpected implications. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(1):76-81. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4259-9.
  8. 8. Banapour P, Sydorak RM, Shaul D. Surgical approach to intussusception in older children: influence of lead points. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(4):647-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.078.
  9. 9. Boluk SE, Bolu S. Intestinal Intussusception Seen in Adult Patients: Case Report. Selcuk Med J 2022;38(3): 92-9.
  10. 10. Olatoke SA, Agodirin SO, Adenuga AT, et al. Primary jejunal melanoma as a cause of adult intussusception: a case report and review of literature. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33:214. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.214.18622.
  11. 11. Bouali O, Mouttalib S, Vial J, et al. Intussusception in infancy and childhood: Radiological and surgical management. Arch Pediatr. 2015;22(12):1312-7. French. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2015.09.002.
  12. 12. Tander B, Baskin D, Candan M, et al. Ultrasound guided reduction of intussusception with saline and comparison with operative treatment. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007;13(4):288-93. PMID: 17978910.
  13. 13. Flaum V, Schneider A, Gomes Ferreira C, et al. Twenty years' experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusceptions by saline enema under sonography control. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(1):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.09.022.
  14. 14. Chew R, Ditchfield M, Paul E, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of image-guided enema reduction techniques for paediatric intussusception: A review of the literature. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(6):711-717. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12601.
  15. 15. Ayana CT, Feleke T, Bazezew A, et al. Treatment outcome of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception and its associated factors among pediatric patients in a resource-limited setting. Pediatr Radiol. 2025;55(9):1829-1837. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06305-3.
  16. 16. Ko HS, Schenk JP, Tröger J, et al. Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(9):2411-21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0589-y.
  17. 17. Fallon SC, Lopez ME, Zhang W, et al. Risk factors for surgery in pediatric intussusception in the era of pneumatic reduction. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(5):1032-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.021.
  18. 18. Betz BW, Hagedorn JE, Guikema JS, et al. Therapeutic enema for pediatric ileocolic intussusception: using a balloon catheter improves efficacy. Emerg Radiol. 2013;20(5):385-91. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1138-4.
  19. 19. Soleimanpour Z, Memarian S, Rajabi MMet al. Clinical and paraclinical differences between pediatric patients requiring surgical versus Non-Surgical treatment for intussusception: A retrospective study at a referral center in Iran. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03131-0.
  20. 20. Wang Q, Luo M, Xie X, et al. Can intussusceptions of small bowel and colon be transient? A prospective study. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(10):1537-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03455-z.
  21. 21. Wang S, Wang Y, Jia L, et al. Transient and persistent small-bowel intussusception in children: a decision tree analysis model based on ultrasound and clinical findings. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03839-6.
  22. 22. Edwards EA, Pigg N, Courtier J, et al. Intussusception: past, present and future. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(9):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3878-x.
  23. 23. Hong KD, Kim J, Ji W, et al. Adult intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(4):315-324. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01980-5.
  24. 24. Lee DH, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, et al. Identifying Predictive Factors for the Recurrence of Pediatric Intussusception. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019;22(2):142-151. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2019.22.2.142.